Warped
Newbie
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2009
- Messages
- 7,546
- Reaction score
- 0
I could write the synopsis for a better ending on a cocktail napkin!
yeah if you had a week to do it. Go ahead Mr, Tell us how it could have ended any better than it had.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I could write the synopsis for a better ending on a cocktail napkin!
Haha wow, when I wrote that post to Adrik I was initially going to respond to what he would've responded too, but after skimming about 3 pages of him uselessly debating and being a tool, I realise now the no point in debating someone so hopelessly a fanboy who resorts to "really just shut up" as an explanation for everything.
Nice job, Adrik, way to be a complete tool
"Heh, I was GONNA respond but im too good for that. tool."
Behind all of my "you are stupid shut up"s were reasons behind me saying that but like No Limit you just kind of see my post and start foaming at the mouth and start mashing the reply key as fast as you can.
Yup. You got me. I'm sorry for calling most of this thread stupid assholes and telling people to shut up and **** themselves when I haven't been able to give them answers beyond "Because they said he's the embodiment of all evil".
I should really stop frothing at the mouth and mashing my keyboard now. Your posts are hurting my feelings ever so much.
I gave up on Fringe after a few episodes. Did it get better later on, is it worth a second try?
Really? The most important and logical explanation is not okay? What the hell do you want? Do you want a scientific explanation? Do you want Faraday to look into the camera while holding up some equation in his notebook and say that the island is a result of dinosaur remains crystalizing into magical light? Here's a question: What is the point of life? Oh wow, did I just blow your mind? These themes and questions about humanity, life, ourselves, are what's important, not the writers guessing what ridiculous trivial details satisfy you.
No really. Most on that list was shit anyways. Im so angry right now! Wow. It's like, my eyes are blurry.
But please give me what you think would have been a better answer then what was given to us Im all ears
Sparta wins. And WTF were those numbers?A lot of the shows biggest answers boil down to "because we say so" and that's it. The Man in Black is evil because we say so. The Man in Black can't leave the island because I say so. He'll destroy the world, why? Because I said he will. You must protect the light because we say so. It could be the source of all live and death on the planet but I know shit all about the island anyway, still you better listen to me! Also, if your brother leaves the island the world will end. Just FYI.
Also yes it's true that I killed your real mother, but listen to me anyway! That's a good boy!I know shit all about the island anyway, still you better listen to me! Also, if your brother leaves the island the world will end. Just FYI.
Its really only been you and No limit dog. Everyone else seems to be keeping it pretty real. You could say they've...Let go....Moved on even.
A lot of the shows biggest answers boil down to "because we say so" and that's it. The Man in Black is evil because we say so. The Man in Black can't leave the island because I say so. He'll destroy the world, why? Because I said he will. You must protect the light because we say so. It could be the source of all live and death on the planet but I know shit all about the island anyway, still you better listen to me! Also, if your brother leaves the island the world will end. Just FYI.
Maybe had the show presented itself as a religious quest from the beginning and not a scientific anomaly it might have been more acceptable.
I think the first few seasons of this show were excellent. The mysteries surrounding the hatch and other dharma stations were enough to catapult this show to the top. But when you take a series long unknown like the whispers and give it that horrendous explanation you might as well shoot yourself in the foot as a writer. The same applies to the smoke monster. I don't know what would have satisfied me as an answer but what was given to us certainly fell short.
Maybe those of us that were let down aren't as easily entertained? Maybe had the show presented itself as a religious quest from the beginning and not a scientific anomaly it might have been more acceptable. Sure, the relationships developed by the characters were intriguing but that doesn't justify molding the story into a soccer mom's wet dream.
I think you're wrong. In fact I think most of you are wrong; wrong in that you have no conception of what is acceptable or appropriate in the realm of narrative. It's almost like you are products of a shallow contemporary culture, operating within self-imposed boundaries of definitions of genre. Are you actually putting a limit on a particular motif? What is it exactly that makes you think Lost's closure is unacceptable?
That you think the show has become a "religious quest" negates you from having anything valuable or introspective to say about it, but let's take a look at your blank expectations. What prohibits you from being able to embrace the show's congeries of themes and its representations of them? I don't think anyone is claiming Lost is perfect. It's a network show, and I'm surprised it's actually managed to deal with the many missteps it's taken--I'm surprised it's been even able to come to this kind of conclusion, and deliver it with such candour. Lost, as a work of fiction, is at liberty to be what it chooses to be. It's a generational fault that prohibits you from appreciating that.
I think the problem honestly is we are all too stupid for this.
I couldn't agree more.
Yup. Glad you guys found the show entertaining because of all those awesome literary themes most average people don't give a shit about.
I'm glad too! Shouldn't you be watching Family Guy or something?
I think that's exactly the point. It is a leap of faith. It's a leap of faith in that you're presented with something emprical; only, you can't say for sure what that is.
I bet anytime you see a movie based on a book you are the guy that always says the book was way better.
Yeah, that's what I said. It's kind of upsetting how many people just don't understand this show.
Not necessarily.
I thought Fight Club was just as good as the book. I thought the original Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was as good. Same goes for Matilda. The Green Mile is a wonderful adaptation. Sin City is great. I found Lord of the Rings to be considerably better than the books. I found The Notebook to be better than the book.
Feel free to try again, though. It's cute as hell that you think you know anything about what I like or don't like, based simply on your own admission that I'm a more intelligent person than you are.
I think you're wrong. In fact I think most of you are wrong; wrong in that you have no conception of what is acceptable or appropriate in the realm of narrative.
It's almost like you are products of a shallow contemporary culture, operating within self-imposed boundaries of definitions of genre.
That you think the show has become a "religious quest" negates you from having anything valuable or introspective to say about it.
What prohibits you from being able to embrace the show's congeries of themes and its representations of them?
Lost, as a work of fiction, is at liberty to be what it chooses to be. It's a generational fault that prohibits you from appreciating that.
You kind of proved my point. Yes you are more intelligent, only when it comes to reading books. Congratulations. I have other things I spend my free time on. The point remains that for most people that don't have a english degree the show was a huge disappointment. You sound like the people that look at picasso and say how brilliant it is when to most people it looks like someone threw up on a canvas.
I think the problem honestly is we are all too stupid for this.
So, your argument is that Damon and Carlton shouldn't have made the show they wanted to, but should have pandered to idiots, such as yourself?
Why is it the majority of people defending the show from legitimate criticism are a bunch of douches?
So, your argument is that Damon and Carlton shouldn't have made the show they wanted to, but should have pandered to idiots, such as yourself?
By your own admission No Limit!
You don't need to prove it. Stop posting, perhaps?
Why is it the majority of people defending the show from legitimate criticism are a bunch of douches?
No Limit presented completely legitimate gripes with the show and was met with the fanboy army. It's a television show, stop pretending it has any impact on your life. It's as though he slapped your mothers across the face.
Also classy move calling people that don't agree with you idiots.