Should the government sponsor gay pride events?

CptStern said:
well the Chinese think it's a disorder then it MUST be true ...oh btw they dont officially recognise autism ....so ya, I can see how they're leading edge when it comes to psychological research :upstare:




btw what is this intense hatred you have of gays? why must you go out of your way to prove that they are mentally disturbed? Your ignorant hate is pretty disgusting if you ask me ...why do you care what other people do with THEIR lives?
So if you aren't having anal sex with homosexuals you are hating them?
 
CptStern said:
well the Chinese think it's a disorder then it MUST be true ...oh btw they dont officially recognise autism ....so ya, I can see how they're leading edge when it comes to psychological research :upstare:

Are you saying the chinese are inferior to us when it comes to psyciatric review? Or are you saying gay people are different in china? Hmm....hypocrit?


CptStern said:
btw what is this intense hatred you have of gays? why must you go out of your way to prove that they are mentally disturbed? Your ignorant hate is pretty disgusting if you ask me ...why do you care what other people do with THEIR lives?

For the same exact reason you go out of your way to be anti-american and anti-freedom.

I don't actually think you are either of those, but it helps to prove my point. Just because you believe in or don't believe in something doesn't mean you like or love it.
 
Glirk Dient said:
Are you saying the chinese are inferior to us when it comes to psyciatric review? Or are you saying gay people are different in china? Hmm....hypocrit?

no I'm saying the GOVERNMENT DOESNT RECOGNIZE AUTISM ...what does that tell you? ...wait that wont work because you think too literally

ok:


they dont pay for diagnosis or treatment because it would mean they have to admit they are wrong






Glirk Dient said:
For the same exact reason you go out of your way to be anti-american and anti-freedom.

how can I be "anti-freedom"? .....hmmmm "that tiger cage looks really comfortable" ...or "maybe I'll commit a crime this weekend cuz I havent been to the new prison yet, I hear it's nice "

Glirk Dient said:
I don't actually think you are either of those, but it helps to prove my point. Just because you believe in or don't believe in something doesn't mean you like or love it.


of course not, I wouldnt get into a homosexual relationship but that doesnt stop me from standing up for what's right ...I believe that if I was around during segregation I would have stood up for civil rights.


my problem with you is that your hate is thinly disguised ...these people have never done anything to you, your hate is irrational. At least I admit I'm intolerant, I'm intolerant of hate, bigotry and discrimination. Either tone it down or admit your bigotry ...at least that way we know where you stand
 
Your the one being a biggot here. You believe anyone who doesn't believe what you do is full of hate and is a biggot. If I turly hated gays I would say they shouldn't be allowed to parade at all, and it should be illegal to be gay. However, since I am not as full of hate as you I just don't think the government should spend the taxpayers money on any special interest groups, or anything the majority of the public doesn't agree with.
 
Glirk Dient said:
Your the one being a biggot here. You believe anyone who doesn't believe what you do is full of hate and is a biggot. If I turly hated gays I would say they shouldn't be allowed to parade at all, and it should be illegal to be gay. However, since I am not as full of hate as you I just don't think the government should spend the taxpayers money on any special interest groups, or anything the majority of the public doesn't agree with.


you said they are mentally diseased ..you've made dozens of bigoted statements about gays in the last week alone. Oh and you're completely missing the point here ...it's not the fact that you disagree with me, it's because you make discriminatory and hateful statements ...dont blame me for something YOU do
 
CptStern said:
you said they are mentally diseased ..you've made dozens of bigoted statements about gays in the last week alone. Oh and you're completely missing the point here ...it's not the fact that you disagree with me, it's because you make discriminatory and hateful statements ...dont blame me for something YOU do
Now you are just flat out lying.
 
Foxtrot said:
I don't understand how it isn't a mental disorder, anyone care the explain the reasoning on that?
He's lying? No, you are full of shit and you are a bigot. I honestly didn't expect much more from you.
 
No Limit said:
He's lying? No, you are full of shit and you are a bigot. I honestly didn't expect much more from you.
Really? Would you like to explain why? Or are you just going to spew out shit without backing it up like you usually do?
 
stop trolling foxtrot it's getting annoying ..you have NOTHING to contribute besides offensive stupid statements such as:


"So if you aren't having anal sex with homosexuals you are hating them?"
 
Foxtrot said:
Really? Would you like to explain why? Or are you just going to spew out shit without backing it up like you usually do?
I quoted your bullshit, is that not enough of an explaination? You said Stern is a liar for claiming you said that homosexuals are mental; I proved it wrong.
 
CptStern said:
stop trolling foxtrot it's getting annoying ..you have NOTHING to contribute besides offensive stupid statements such as:


"So if you aren't having anal sex with homosexuals you are hating them?"
You are the one trolling, asshole. You called Glirk a biggot, are you ****ing insane? You also said he has made dozens of biggoted statements (concering homosexuality) care to back that up? Thats what I thought, stfu.

Oh and No Limit, if your post was actually worth disporving I would, but really, you just made shit up against so I don't even need to say anything beyond this.
 
Foxtrot said:
You are the one trolling, asshole. You called Glirk a biggot, are you ****ing insane? You also said he has made dozens of biggoted statements (concering homosexuality) care to back that up? Thats what I thought, stfu.

Oh and No Limit, if your post was actually worth disporving I would, but really, you just made shit up against so I don't even need to say anything beyond this.


:upstare:


hateful statements made by Glirk Dient:



"Homosexuality is disgusting. Why should society benefit their disgusting choice and perverted practices when they don't offer anything back? IE. Children."


"Homosexuality is just a disgusting act people do in bedrooms. They should be happy they are accepted in society and not shun to an underground."


"Normal people find this disgusting, it is wrong. No one wants to see people, gay or hetero do this in public. PDA from anyone is not right"



"maybe if we just give them civil unions they will finally shutup and keep it to their bedrooms...that would be a whole lot better than hearing or seeing them do it in public...simply disgusting"


"Just because they choose to be different doesn't mean I am going to pay them to assblast in the streets."

"I just don't see why they need tax breaks to be happy together, it's their choice so then they chose to not have tax breaks. Their own fault, not our problem. On top of that they can't offer anything to society."


"It is because our society has values and marriage isn't something to throw around for whichever perverted person wants to marry something out of the norm"

"Goths and other losers choose to be shunned. They choose the way they dress and act. They could change and become normal if thay wanted, but they don't."

"should we all go around and parade about diseases or other crap people got when they were born? Hooray, today is the crack baby parade! We could also have paralyzed from birth day, mental retardation awareness week as well as aids aids aids everywhere day!"



btw dont question MY sources ...less of a chance of me making you look like an ass
 
CptStern said:
:upstare:


hateful statements made by Glirk Dient:

"Homosexuality is disgusting. Why should society benefit their disgusting choice and perverted practices when they don't offer anything back? IE. Children."


"Homosexuality is just a disgusting act people do in bedrooms. They should be happy they are accepted in society and not shun to an underground."


"Normal people find this disgusting, it is wrong. No one wants to see people, gay or hetero do this in public. PDA from anyone is not right"



"maybe if we just give them civil unions they will finally shutup and keep it to their bedrooms...that would be a whole lot better than hearing or seeing them do it in public...simply disgusting"


"Just because they choose to be different doesn't mean I am going to pay them to assblast in the streets."

"I just don't see why they need tax breaks to be happy together, it's their choice so then they chose to not have tax breaks. Their own fault, not our problem. On top of that they can't offer anything to society."


"It is because our society has values and marriage isn't something to throw around for whichever perverted person wants to marry something out of the norm"

"Goths and other losers choose to be shunned. They choose the way they dress and act. They could change and become normal if thay wanted, but they don't."

"should we all go around and parade about diseases or other crap people got when they were born? Hooray, today is the crack baby parade! We could also have paralyzed from birth day, mental retardation awareness week as well as aids aids aids everywhere day!"

And that is his opinion and what he believes, and for the most part he is right. Those parades are disgusting, and should not be paid for by the government.
Oh and from that gem of a post, I can tell you also probably don't know what bigot is, so here you go
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=bigot
 
Foxtrot said:
And that is his opinion and what he believes, and for the most part he is right.


according to who? you? of course I dont expect you to understand ...you're also a bigot :E

Foxtrot said:
Those parades are disgusting,


bigot

Foxtrot said:
and should not be paid for by the government.
Oh and from that gem of a post, I can tell you also probably don't know what bigot is, so here you go
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=bigot


ummm maybe you should have read a little closer:


"One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ."
 
CptStern said:
according to who? you? of course I dont expect you to understand ...you're also a bigot :E




bigot




ummm maybe you should have read a little closer:


"One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ."

I can tolerate them, I just think those parades are terrible, and some things some of the homosexuals do are disgusting, oh and any gay sex is pretty disgusting too.
 
how does it affect you in any way? dont like gay pride parades dont go ..if you dont like gay sex dont have gay sex ...easy as that


ok so maybe I should just label you as "intolerant" instead of bigoted?
 
No Limit said:
Unless its girl on girl, right?
It depends who too, not your average I'm-too-fat-to-get-a-guy-lesbian (all the ones I know) but hot pornstar lesbians.

CptStern said:
how does it affect you in any way? dont like gay pride parades dont go ..if you dont like gay sex dont have gay sex ...easy as that


ok so maybe I should just label you as "intolerant" instead of bigoted?
It affects me when I have to pay for it.
 
Stop bickering, again (always the same offenders) or the thread will be closed.
 
It depends who too, not your average I'm-too-fat-to-get-a-guy-lesbian (all the ones I know) but hot pornstar lesbians.

:| I really hope you're not serious there, because if you are it just undermines your entire argument.

It affects me when I have to pay for it.

I'd still like to know why you hate gay people so much. Because it's obviously not just about whether the government should sponsor Pride parades anymore - you seem to really, really hate homosexuals. Seriously, why?

I also don't see any proper response to my 'homosexuality is not a mental disease' post. Does that mean you've dropped that line of argument?
 
Homosexuality is not wrong or particularly disgusting. I would say that sexual relationships between the same sexes are but that is my opinion, and I am sure some homosexuals view intercourse between a man and a woman the same way. But the point is, and the topic of this thread is Should the government fund thier events and recognize thier month. I say no. The government should not fund any parades or holidays, it should be left up to the organizers to find money. Does anyone know how a holiday is officialized? I don't.

Having a Gay Pride month is segregating them even more, giving fuel to peoples hate. What needs to be done is to breach the gap, and get them back into society, not having pride parades and months. Which brings up to topic of gay marriage.

While this may not be "legal" according to some religious sects, the US should regonize it. It was not causing any problems before, why is it any different now? If you were walking down the street i would bet you money that you could not point out a gay or lesbian. (I am talking about the regular ones, not the ones in tight leather pants...etc which IS NOT the majority). Unfortunatly, as with anything to do with hate, the extreemes are seen as the majority, and this is simply not the case. If you actually talked with a a homosexual, all they want is to be able to get married, adopt children, and live NORMAL lives.

BTW, Cpt.Stern, you do tend to be intolerant of others points of view, FYI. And Foxtrot, you are not debating well.

My $0.02
 
in my personal opinion, if they sponsor black history month, and chinese new year, etc, etc, then they should sponsor gay pride too, as a cultural event.
 
Kebean PFC said:
BTW, Cpt.Stern, you do tend to be intolerant of others points of view, FYI. .

I agree, when it comes to discrimination/bigotry I have NO tolerance ...but I'm unapologetic
 
Sulkdodds said:
:| I really hope you're not serious there, because if you are it just undermines your entire argument.



I'd still like to know why you hate gay people so much. Because it's obviously not just about whether the government should sponsor Pride parades anymore - you seem to really, really hate homosexuals. Seriously, why?

I also don't see any proper response to my 'homosexuality is not a mental disease' post. Does that mean you've dropped that line of argument?
I must have missed your post, and no I wasn't being too serious with that, as I thought the question was shit to start with. I don't hate gay people, and I have no idea why you would think so. Just because I don't think they are normal means I hate them?



Sulkdodds said:
Homosexuality is not a mental illness or condition: it is an alternative sexual orientation. That's something compeltely different. You might as well argue that, say, an attraction to dark-haired women over others is also a mental illness - it's the same thing, but less extreme.
That is flawed reasoning, people are born to be attracted to the opposite sex, otherwise we would not exist. Obviously being attracted to the opposite sex is normal, the way we were made, the right way. Some people aren't, not olny do they have no attraction to the opposite sex, but they are attracted to the same sex, which obviously isn't right. What would make someone be attracted to the same sex, when they are born to be attracted to the opposite sex?
 
Foxtrot said:
What would make someone be attracted to the same sex, when they are born to be attracted to the opposite sex?

Nature's population control?
 
kirovman said:
Nature's population control?
But they aren't always born that way, and it doesn't always have an affect on population.
 
I don't think it's our place to tell them they are living the wrong lifestyle, as long as noone is being hurt. What goes on behind closed doors is none of our business.
 
kirovman said:
I don't think it's our place to tell them they are living the wrong lifestyle, as long as noone is being hurt. What goes on behind closed doors is none of our business.
I agree, we shouldn't tell them how to live their lives unless it affects other people.
 
falconwind said:
in my personal opinion, if they sponsor black history month, and chinese new year, etc, etc, then they should sponsor gay pride too, as a cultural event.

Well in that case... bring on Video Game day.
 
Raziaar said:
Well in that case... bring on Video Game day.

I wholeheartedly endorse the aforementioned product/event/activity(s) :bounce:
 
Foxtrot said:
I must have missed your post, and no I wasn't being too serious with that, as I thought the question was shit to start with. I don't hate gay people, and I have no idea why you would think so. Just because I don't think they are normal means I hate them?

Maybe hate is the wrong word then ... ?
 
MjM said:
Maybe hate is the wrong word then ... ?
Let me put it this way, I wouldn't mind having a gay friend (I might even have one, but none that I know of) unless he talks about making out with another guy, or ass ramming him, oh and as long as he doesn't fit any of the annoying stereotypes. I compare it to two really obese people haveing sex, it just isn't something I want to see or hear about.
 
Theres quite a marked difference between something being unnatural and disgusting.
 
MjM said:
Theres quite a marked difference between something being unnatural and disgusting.
To me, homosexuality (atleast anything physical about it) is both unatural and disgusting.
 
That is flawed reasoning, people are born to be attracted to the opposite sex, otherwise we would not exist. Obviously being attracted to the opposite sex is normal, the way we were made, the right way. Some people aren't, not olny do they have no attraction to the opposite sex, but they are attracted to the same sex, which obviously isn't right. What would make someone be attracted to the same sex, when they are born to be attracted to the opposite sex?
I've just been inside the mind of genius. I notice nobody has really answered this, so I'm bumping the point.
 
Certainly not crowding. Humans don't live in nearly a crowded enough world for their genetics to start mutating into different strands of evolution.

Maybe when we have 40 thousand people all crammed together and yet still able to cope with it, just barely... we will.

I would say the human race is living 'quite' comfortably, at least comfortable enough to warrant a genetic change to start forming varied strands to stave off breeding.
 
Foxtrot said:
Let me put it this way, I wouldn't mind having a gay friend (I might even have one, but none that I know of) unless he talks about making out with another guy, or ass ramming him, oh and as long as he doesn't fit any of the annoying stereotypes. I compare it to two really obese people haveing sex, it just isn't something I want to see or hear about.

It's not as if any two people having sex in public is desirable. Why narrow down gays saying they're disgusting? It's disgusting if anyone does it in public, straight, gay, bi or beastial.

Raziaar said:
Certainly not crowding. Humans don't live in nearly a crowded enough world for their genetics to start mutating into different strands of evolution.

Maybe when we have 40 thousand people all crammed together and yet still able to cope with it, just barely... we will.

I would say the human race is living 'quite' comfortably, at least comfortable enough to warrant a genetic change to start forming varied strands to stave off breeding.

Pre-emptive evolution? I don't mean physical crowding as in not enough space or land, I mean crowding as in no availible resources - ie famines, droughts, etc. We've experienced plenty of them in our history.
 
gh0st said:
I've just been inside the mind of genius. I notice nobody has really answered this, so I'm bumping the point.

Does it really matter in this debate. There ARE homosexuals, so its a moot point, in the context of this topic. so it just becomes a debate about whether or not society is willing to treat them as equals.
 
Back
Top