secret friend
Newbie
- Joined
- May 13, 2006
- Messages
- 260
- Reaction score
- 0
I said: "if every human being on the planet screwed ONLY animals then the human race would cease to exist. "
That's a true statement.
That's a true statement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Ikerous said:It is a true statement, but after you said that, you said "That's why we shouldn't have sex with animals."
Okay... how does that relate to the topic at all?secret friend said:Alright, then that's why we shouldn't have sex ONLY with animals.
Ikerous said:Okay... how does that relate to the topic at all?
(although by that same logic it's still wrong to be gay)
I realize it's a social construction, I'm simply asking if it's logical or notsecret friend said:Well Ikerous, it's all a social constructon. In some cultures, it is normal for men to have sex with animals. In ours, it isn't.
If you don't give a damn about conforming to our cultural standards, then you might as well go have sex with animals. It's also not like you believe in God or that he is going to punish you for having sex with animals, right?
Ikerous said:I realize it's a social construction, I'm simply asking if it's logical or not
And no, I don't believe in any god.
Sulkdodds made a few pretty good points in this threadRaeven0 said:Ikerous, have the dissenters presented any valid arguments against your specific example? I'm not sure I want to read a hundred posts of 10% effective text
can you please recap what he said?Ikerous said:Sulkdodds made a few pretty good points in this thread
Other than that it's been a bit slow
This is the only life i've got, it's quite worth taking seriouslysecret friend said:life is not worth taking seriously.
some people cut the chickens' heads off and bang them in there.Ikerous said:I'd imagine having sex with several of those would cause a lotta pain for the animal...
Especially chickens XD
secret friend said:some people cut the chicken's heads off and bang them in there.
...You'd certainly know what semen tastes like... wouldn't you? :xJNightshade said:So THAT'S why my nuggets taste like semen!
Infern0 said:but I think most of you have googled for zoophillic pornography before.
This is why if you're gunna screw a cow, I strongly recommend a condom peopleInfern0 said:The most critical argument so far has been safety/spread of disease. Animals have plenty of bacteria and/or virii, and alot of deadly human diseases come from them.
Ikerous said:
Actually i can't imagine thats common at all
This is why if you're gunna screw a cow, I strongly recommend a condom people
Some ppl might assume if they can't get it pregant what's the pointsecret friend said:what retard would **** a cow without a condom???
Try telling that to a jury and see how far you get. I tell you, the air turns positively frosty.Qonfused said:It's all determined by your own morality.
Ikerous said:Some ppl might assume if they can't get it pregant what's the point
el Chi said:Try telling that to a jury and see how far you get. I tell you, the air turns positively frosty.
But the poll is biased because people are socially conditioned to regard bestiality as wrong by default - as the prevailence of 'OMG GROSS EWW EWW' replies to this thread shows. The fact that Ikerous acts like he's already considering using a hamser as a comdom hardly helps.Qonfused said:This has already been established as law and in your own poll.
Even with his specific example, it's still wrong. I think it's impossible to say that bestiality is actually 'ok' - unless you acknowledge that animals have no rights at all. Either it's wrong, or nothing much that we do to animals is wrong.Raeven0 said:Ikerous, have the dissenters presented any valid arguments against your specific example?
I didn't know animals had rights. The whole "lack of any reasonable degree of mental-emotional complexity" thing kind of precludes any chance of getting me to shower rights upon them.Sulkdodds said:Even with his specific example, it's still wrong. I think it's impossible to say that bestiality is actually 'ok' - unless you acknowledge that animals have no rights at all. Either it's wrong, or nothing much that we do to animals is wrong.
Rizzo89 said:It's intressting. Plus it turned in to kind of a spam thread.