Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Pretty muchFat Tony! said:Yeah okay fine I guess there is nothing wrong with it apart from the fact it is an exceedingly disgusting act. Which is why we don't do it.
JNightshade said:Although, I must admit, Ikerous has some weeeeeeeird taste in topics
Ikerous said:Ya, its definitely gross. But with a condom it can at least be hygenic (Despite get cow shit all over you). As for abuse of power, it seems far more abusive to kill the animal cuz it's tastey than it does to screw it (assuming theres no pain invovlved in either). And it really isn't all that different than forcing the animal to do anything else :/ It just seems that because we get pleasuer from it that it's wrong but if we don't get pleasure from it then it's okay (ie a guard dog) Although we get pleasure from owning pets. So maybe not. Perhaps its just wrong cuz its sexual pleasure? But does that actually make it wrong, or are we just stigmatized against sexual gratification?
I think I've made it quite clear I think bestiality is disgusting :/Raziaar said:By the way Ikerous... since you're so into beastiality, you should check out a donkey show. Nasty stuff.
Ikerous said:I think I've made it quite clear I think bestiality is disgusting :/
About a dozen times...
That's unproven. Whilst it's true that the HIV virus did most likely originate in Chimpanzees, its transfer to humans was far more likely to do with blood-letting in rituals and bites, etc. than it was to do with bestiality.hungryduck said:It's how so many STDs came to fruition.....and AID's for that matter.
Are you referring to the topic example?the_wolf27 said:Apart from the fact that you can catch diseases, and that its cruel to animals.
It may not be the happiest logic, but I dont see anywhere I've gone wrongRaziaar said:I don't like your logic, Ikerous.
Well if you take that small part out of context yes.. it does sound quite twistedRaziaar said:You exploit them just because they don't know any better? That's twisted, dude.
Well.. then why is it wrong?Raziaar said:No... i'm not putting human children anywhere into the mix here... I just think its completely ****ed up that you think the world's animals are our sex toys, justifiably simply because they won't feel pain or won't know what's going on... those being your assumptions.
Ikerous said:Well.. then why is it wrong?
I think that we can logically conclude if something is wrong or notRaziaar said:Dude... society, laws, morality. These are the things why it is wrong, why it is taboo. We humans have evolved to be able to develop these things for ourselves, and you're completely ignoring them.
I'd really appreciate an exampleRaziaar said:You're going to keep saying the same thing you're saying to EVERY thing somebody here says to you, as if you're somehow right just because you feel you are. You talk about humans having rights, yet you ignore the other areas of humanity where this exact thing is wrong.
Discussion?99.vikram said:What is it exactly that you have created?
I'm completely opposed to hurting animalsAnimals have absolutely no rights
Ikerous said:I'm completely opposed to animal abuse
_Z_Ryuken said:Discussion?
I realized that and quickly changed it to hurting animals to make myself more clearRaziaar said:By the very definition of the word, it's abuse. Abuse being misuse. But... **** it, i'm done with it all.
Pointless for you maybe.99.vikram said:Discussion that has meandered pointlessly for 13 pages?
Sorry, Ikerous :dork:
I've only read like 3 or 4 of them so it's all still very new to me.99.vikram said:Discussion that has meandered pointlessly for 13 pages?
Sorry, Ikerous :dork:
I've pretty much made my conclusion, and I believe it has a fairly firm basis99.vikram said:Ikerous, you know as well as I do that this won't lead to a conclusion. There are very interesting points here, but in the last few pages the arguments have mostly been the same.
Ikerous said:I've pretty much made my conclusion, and I believe it has a fairly firm basis
Although that by no means I'm not willing to change it if a good counterpoint is made
And the arguments have been the exact same throughout most of the thread :/
A lot of people don't really like reading long ass threads before posting their opinion
Ya, with issues like this, or really any issue, it's hard to come to a conclusion thats completely satisfying for everyone99.vikram said:I meant an end-all conclusion
See ^_^ The thread wasn't so pointless afterall then99.vikram said:If nothing else at least I'm beginning to understand your perspective.
I totally agree.The world would be a worse off place than it is, if everybody took that logic.
ConsentMr-Fusion said:Logic and morals don't always mix perfectly.
I know it has been said already but you could use the same logic you're applying to having sex with animals to having sex with a comatose girl. That logic is
1. The victim wouldn't feel anything
2. You wouldn't contract a disease due to protection
3. You wouldn't tell the victim what happened after if they ever wake up
Are they instinctive, or socially conditioned?Mr-Fusion said:As has been covered, morals are sometimes based on logical reasoning, sometimes it's based on something far more instinctive and undefinable.